Which dimension is NOT typically included in the analysis of sustainability performance?

Sustainability performance is typically analyzed through three foundational dimensions: social, economic, and environmental. These dimensions encapsulate the broad spectrum of factors that organizations must consider to ensure sustainable practices.

The social dimension examines how an organization impacts its stakeholders, including employees, customers, and the community. This involves assessing workplace conditions, community engagement, and social equity.

The economic dimension focuses on the financial implications of sustainability initiatives, analyzing how sustainable practices can contribute to cost savings, profitability, and long-term financial viability.

The environmental dimension assesses the ecological impact of an organization's operations, including resource usage, waste management, and emissions levels.

In contrast, the technological dimension, while important in facilitating sustainable practices (such as through innovation and energy-efficient solutions), does not form a core part of the traditional framework for analyzing sustainability performance. It relates more to the tools and methods that can improve sustainability rather than being a standalone dimension of the sustainability performance assessment itself. Therefore, recognizing this distinction clarifies why the technological aspect is not typically included in the main three dimensions of sustainability analysis.